|
|
|||
|
Prof. Delhommelle's Homepage Teaching Publications Research Group Members News !!! Online Submission to "Molecular Simulation"
Phone 701.777.2495 Fax 701.777.2331 Department of Chemistry University of North Dakota 151 Cornell Street Stop 9024 Grand Forks, ND 58202 |
Cross-Nucleation
Understanding and controlling in which structure (or polymorph) a molecule
crystallizes are complex and long-standing issues. In many cases, a process
yields crystals of more than one polymorph at the same time, making the control
of polymorphism even more challenging. Several mechanisms have been proposed
to account for this phenomenon, known as concomitant polymorphism. It has
been attributed either to competing processes of homogeneous nucleation of
different polymorphs or to solvent-mediated conversion of one polymorph into
another or, more recently, to the heterogeneous nucleation (or cross-nucleation)
of one polymorph on another. We use molecular dynamics simulations to study
the early stages of crystallization in a supercooled liquid of spherical
particles. We observe the onset of concomitant polymorphism and demonstrate
that this phenomenon results from the cross-nucleation of a metastable polymorph
on the stable polymorph. We also show that cross-nucleation is selective
since it only takes place between polymorphs of almost equivalent free energy.
Our simulations provide detailed insights into the molecular mechanism underlying
concomitant polymorphism and cross-nucleation.
L. Yu
C. Desgranges and J. Delhommelle
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 6380 (2003) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 15104 (2006) Cross nucleation between polymorphs in D-mannitol (left) and Lennard Jones (right) systems.
We show
that cross-nucleation is mostly governed by kinetics. First, we observe the
nucleation of a metastable polymorph (hcp) on a crystal of the stable polymorph.
Moreover, cross-nucleation takes place because the metastable polymorph (hcp)
grows at a faster rate than the stable polymorph (fcc), as shown in Figure
1 for t = 57. These two findings are supported by the experimental results
from Yu et al. In their study of cross-nucleation, they show that metastable
polymorphs may nucleate on stable polymorphs. Besides, they conclude that
the new polymorph formed grows faster than (or at least as fast as) the one
initially present. However, while cross-nucleation is essentially controlled
by kinetics, our results also show that the relative stability of the polymorphs
plays an important role. We only observe cross-nucleation between polymorphs
of almost equivalent free energies. If the free energy of a polymorph is
notably larger, as it is the case for bcc here, particles of this polymorph
may appear, but they quickly convert into one of the more stable polymorphs
before a large cluster forms. This shows that cross-nucleation is selective.
C. Desgranges and J. Delhommelle J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 15104 (2006)
C. Desgranges and J. Delhommelle, J. Phys. Chem. B. 111, 1465 (2007)
We examine
the results obtained for the growth step. We present in Fig. 4 the averages
for the number of hcp particles, calculated over all the MD trajectories,
obtained for the highest and lowest degrees of supercooling, i.e., 22% and
10%, against the number of particles contained in the crystallites. Our results
demonstrate that we succeed in controlling cross nucleation. Figure 4 clearly
shows that, by increasing the temperature, we manage to reduce by a factor
of 2 the increase in the number of hcp particles with the size of the nucleus,
which suggests that cross nucleation has been prevented for a supercooling
of 10%. This is confirmed by the snapshots presented in Fig. 5. For the highest
supercooling (22%), we observe the formation of layers of hcp particles and
thus of large hcp domains within the crystallite. This corresponds to the
cross nucleation of the hcp form on the fcc form. For the lowest supercooling
(10%), we do not observe the formation of such large hcp domains. hcp particles
form on the surface of the fcc core of the crystallite and their number increases
with the surface of the nucleus. Therefore, at low supercooling, we do not
observe any cross nucleation and obtain an essentially pure fcc crystallite.
We interpret this result as follows. The cross nucleation of the hcp form
on the fcc form is a kinetic phenomenon, which, like any other heterogeneous
nucleation process, is associated with a free energy barrier of activation.
As for homogeneous nucleation, increasing the temperature (or decreasing
the supercooling) results in an increase in the height of the free energy
barrier. This, in turn, prevents cross nucleation and allows us to form pure
fcc crystallites at low supercooling.
C. Desgranges and J. Delhommelle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 235502 (2007).
|
|||