Minutes of the University Senate Meeting
November 4, 2010
1.
The November meeting
of the University Senate was held at 4:05 p.m. on Thursday, November 4, 2010 in
Room 7, Gamble Hall. Kathy Smart presided.
2.
The following
members of the Senate were present:
Anderson, Julie
Antonova, Slavka
Baker, Mary
Benoit, Joseph
Berger, Albert
Blackburn, Royce
Bonner Melissa
Bowman, Frank
Brekke, Alice
Campbell, Kate
Casler, James
Doze, Van
Drewes, Mary
Elbert, Dennis
El-Rewini, Hesham
Fershee, Kendra
Flower, Ann
Francis, Clare
Gerbert, Shane
Gonsalez-Smith, Suzanne
Guy, Mark
Hauschild, Grant
Heitkamp, Thomasine
Iiams, Michele
Jackson, Jon
Jeno, Sue
Johnson, Corbin
Kelley, Robert
Kistner, Brian
Kitzes, Adam
Kubatova, Alena
Laguette, Soizik
LeBel, Paul
Liepold, Loren
Marasinghe, Kanishka
Mayzer, Roni
Moen, Joseph
Munski, Doug
Murphy, Eric
Noiva, Jennifer
Oversen, Kylie
Potvin, Martha
Rice, Daniel
Routon, Claudia
Schauer, Roger
Seddoh, Amebu
Semke, William
Senn, Ryan
Smart, Kathy
Smith, Bruce
Smith, Wesley
Stofferahn, Curt
Stolt, Wilbur
Stone, Jan
Swartz, Kristi
Tyree, Elizabeth
Ullrich, Gary
Urton, Raina
Worley, Deborah
Young, William
3.
The following
members of the Senate were absent:
Anderson, Ernest
Anderson, Suzanne
Badahdah, Abdallah
Bakke, Matthew
Bonner, Kelly
Boyd, Robert
Dunlevy, Jane
Halgren, Cara
Hall, Judith
Higgins, James
Jehlicka, Brenden
Johnson, Phyllis
Keengwe, Jared
Kenney, Lynda
Kenville, Kimberly
Larson, Claire
Lei, Saobo
McBride, Rosanne
Minnotte, Krista
Mosher, Sarah
Onchwari, Grace
Rakow, Lana
Rand, Kathryn
Riedy, Joshua
Runge, Robin
Sturges, Denyse
Suleiman, Nabil
Watson, William
Wynne, Joshua
4.
The following announcements were made:
5.
Ms. Smart asked for
corrections or additions to the minutes of the October 7, 2010 meeting; hearing
none, the minutes were approved as distributed.
6.
The question period was
opened at 4:10 p.m.
a. Mr. Munski moved to
allow Mr. Petros to speak to the Senate. The motion
was seconded and carried. Mr. Petros expressed his
concern about President Kelley appointing Mr. LeBel as Provost without a
national search. He asked the President to address his concerns. President
Kelley responded by providing the history and explaining the factors that
affected his decision. He reported that he had consulted with the University
leadership, i.e., department heads, deans, the University, Staff and Student
Senate leaderships, the President’s cabinet, and the State Board of Higher
Education, and received a uniform statement of confidence to move ahead with
the appointment. Mr. Petros echoed his confidence in
Mr. LeBel and stated he was happy with the explanation. Mr. Murphy suggested
that the President should have addressed the Senate as a whole instead of just
its leadership, and the President accepted that suggestion.
b. It was moved and seconded to allow Jeff Weatherly
to address the Senate. He asked President Kelley if the existing and upcoming
Dean openings would require national searches. The President deferred the
question to Mr. LeBel, who then reported that the search committees had been
formed and that the interim incumbents will be considered for the positions if
they apply for them.
c. Mr. Gerbert asked
why the bus stops across from the Christus Rex have
been eliminated. Ms. Brekke replied that there was an
immediate safety issue. A survey is being conducted and when the results are
complete, the issue will be re-visited. Mr. Gerbert
inquired about what the safety issues were and Ms. Brekke
referred him to Peggy Lucke.
d. Mr. Munski
congratulated the University on obtaining support for the new Gorecki Alumni Center. He then stated that he had a
three-part question regarding land use planning related to the new Center. His
first question was, What will be done to obtain lost recreational space for
students due to the location of the Alumni Center and who will be involved in
that decision? Mr. Murphy replied that the Student Wellness Center was working
on green space for outdoor student recreation on the Bronson
property. These discussions were initiated in a meeting with the Student
Wellness Advisory Committee last spring and again this fall. The plan is
coming together nicely and will offer students a place to play flag football
and other outdoor pursuits. Ms. Brekke stated
that a master plan has been made that will eventually open up more green space
when old housing is eliminated. Mr. Munski’s second
question was, How will the parking lot adjacent to the
new Alumni Center be zoned and will Alumni Association/UND Foundation personnel
be paying appropriately? Ms. Brekke replied that the Parking Committee will address
those issues. Mr. Munski deferred his third question
to another time due to the lack of time remaining in the question period and to
accommodate other questions.
e. Mr. Berger asked what will happen to the
historic Oxford House and the Strinden Center when
the new Alumni Center project goes forward. President Kelley replied that they
will be affected and that the future College of Business expansion project will
affect those buildings as well. One option would be to move the Oxford House so
it could be preserved. He did not have any information regarding the Strinden Center. Mr. Berger stated that if the Oxford House
was moved from its original location it could lose its historical distinction.
The question period
closed at 4:35 p.m.
7.
Mr. Stofferahn moved to approve the Continuing
Education Committee annual report. The motion was seconded and the report was
approved as submitted.
8.
Mr. LeBel presented two policies for inclusion in the Faculty
Handbook: 1) Promotion of Special Appointment Faculty; and 2) Evaluation of
Online Instruction. Mr. Munski moved and Mr. Murphy
seconded to split the vote on each policy. The motion was approved unanimously.
Mr. Munski moved and Mr. Murphy
seconded to approve the Promotion of Special Appointment Faculty policy.
Discussion ensued. Mr. Murphy moved to postpone discussion on this policy until
the January Senate meeting. Mr. Berger seconded and the motion passed with a
vote of 44 for and 1 against.
Mr. Munski moved to approve the
Evaluation of Online Instruction policy. The motion was seconded and discussion
ensued. The motion was approved with a vote of 51 for and 1 against.
9.
Brad Meyers, on behalf of the Conflict of Interest/Scientific
Misconduct Committee, presented a proposed change to the Conflict of Interest
Policy. He explained that the change had to do with documentation requirements
for employees in the 6000 and 7000 bands. Mr. Munski
moved to approve the change and Mr. Gerbert seconded.
Discussion ensued. A question was asked about why just the 6000 and 7000 bands.
Mr. Meyers replied that they were the bands brought to the Committee for
review. It doesn’t change who is covered, it just eases the documentation
required. The motion was approved with a vote of 46 for, 3 against, and 3
abstentions.
10.
The meeting adjourned at 5:03 p.m.
Submitted by Lori Hofland
for Suzanne Anderson, Secretary to the Senate