Minutes of the University Senate Meeting
October 5, 2006
1.
The October meeting
of the University Senate was held at 4:05 p.m. on Thursday, October 5, 2006 in
Room 7, Gamble Hall. Douglas Munski presided.
2.
The following
members of the Senate were present:
Anderson, Cindy
Anderson, Suzanne
Baker, Mary
Bass, Gail
Benoit, Joseph
Berne, Jane
Boyd, Robert
Bradley, April
Campbell, Katherine
Cripe, Haylee
Drewes, Mary
Erickson, Daniel
Faruque, Saleh
Ferraro, Richard
Fisher, Jay
Flom-Meland, Cynthia
Folkestad, Sara
Gallager, Robert
Gosnold, Will
Haskins, James
Hilliard, Nathaniel
Hume, Wendelin
Iiams, Michele
Iverson, Joneen
Jackson, Jon
Jackson, Margaret
Jeno, Sue
Jerath, Sukhvarsh
Koeser, Brandon
Lane, Jason
LaVenture, Andrew
Lawrence, David
Light, Steven
Little, Michael
Lothspeich, Jason
Mahar, Patricia
Mamaghani, Iraj
Martindale, Nathan
Mayzer, Roni
Moen, Jan
Munski, Douglas
Murphy, Eric
Olsen, Glenn
Owens, Sarah
Perkins, Dexter
Perry, David
Petros, Thomas
Picklo, Matthew
Poochigian, Donald
Potvin, Martha
Rakow, Lana
Rex, Janet
Rice, Daniel
Rieke, Judy
Rosenberger, Thad
Schnellert, Gary
Seddoh, Samuel
Stofferahn, Curtis
Stolt, Wilbur
Streibel, Kent
Watson, John
Wittgraf, Michael
3.
The following
members of the Senate were absent:
Alfonso, Peter
Behrmann, William
Covington, Chandice
Dewar, Graeme
Elbert, Dennis
Elsinga, Lillian
Heitkamp, Thomasine
Jacobson, Rachelle
Johnson, Stefan
Kelsch, Steven
Kitzes, Adam
Kupchella, Charles
LaPointe, Gary
LeBel, Paul
Marasinghe, Kanishka
Myers, Bradley
Nowacki, Michael
Rendahl, Stephen
Robertson, Charles
Smart, Kathy
Smith, Bruce
Venhuizen, Brett
Weisenstein, Greg
Williams, Jim
Wilson, H. David
Yurkovich, Eleanor
4.
The following announcements
were made:
Mr.
Murphy asked questions regarding the medical school facilities heating issues.
A second question was posed as to who sets legislative priorities. Mr. Gallager indicated that the priorities are set by the vice
presidents and approved by the President.
2. Don
Kojich reported on the Education Marketing Group
(EMG) and the brand audit, which is being conducted for UND. The EMG
representatives were on campus for two and a half days. Mr. Kojich
thanked the senators for their participation in the process. The first phase of
the process is the campus interview on our communication and branding of the
institution. Participation is very important. The second phase will be surveying
external audiences. The third phase is on-campus focus groups on brand drivers.
A question was asked about the cost for consulting. Mr. Kojich
indicated it was $110,000 plus expenses. Mr. Petros
expressed a concern about how diverse UND is and the message being too narrow. Mr.
Petros indicated he would hold further comment until seeing
the end result. Mr. Murphy reported on the meeting the EMG had with University
Senate members and explained that a lot of concerns were alleviated.
Mr.
Munski thanked Don Kojich. Mr.
Koijich explained that the process is a consensus
process and participation is important after which he again expressed thanks to
the Senate.
3. Mr.
Poochigian reported on the Council of College Faculties
meeting held September 21 with the State Board of Higher Education. The CCF
held a preliminary meeting before meeting with the Board. Mr. Poochigian reported the following items: Minnesota is
considering a new tuition policy, which would offer free tuition to the top 25%
of classes for years one and two and free tuition to certain majors for years three
and four; North Dakota is considering what to do about tuition in light of this
possible tuition change in Minnesota, a Green Ribbon campaign will discuss the
tuition issue; NDSU presented information on the upcoming Arts and Humanities Festival
October 27 and 28; Mr. Poochigian did a presentation
that addressed the issue that there is a sense that faculty do not work very
hard. Mr. Benoit commented that the Council of Deans and Provost are preparing
materials and will discuss this matter as well; the final matter reported on was
discussion regarding faculty salaries. The State Board of Higher Education will
discuss salaries for campus presidents after a study done by the McKnight
Committee. The expectation is that there will be a proposal for a 5% raise for
presidents due to the study showing that campus presidents are underpaid. Faculty
salaries would not be considered within the McKnight information; however,
there was a shared first indication that there would be a 4% raise and possibly
a 4.5% raise for faculty. Mr. Poochigian reported
that a comment was made by Richie Smith of the State Board
that there is not enough money, and that no one else spoke to that issue. He also stated that the meeting with the State
Board of Higher Education and the Council of College Faculties was a friendly
meeting.
5.
The Chair asked for
corrections or additions to the September 7, 2006 minutes. Hearing none, the
minutes were approved as distributed.
6.
The question period
was opened at 4:47 p.m.
Mr. Perkins stated
that he understands that the Division I issue will be addressed at the next
meeting when President Kupchella will be present. Mr.
Perkins also stated that he had heard that development funds that are not
earmarked all go to athletics, and asked if that was true. Mr. Gallagher
indicated this was not true; most unrestricted funds go to student scholarships.
Other senators indicated they understood that to be correct. Mr. Perkins
expressed his pleasure at hearing this clarification.
The question period
closed at 4:49 p.m.
7.
Mr. Petros moved to accept the annual reports of the Senate
Committee on Committees, the Senate Continuing Education, Distance Education
& Outreach Committee, the Senate Faculty Instructional Development
Committee, and the Senate University Assessment Committee. Mr. Jackson asked
for clarification on the meeting dates listed in the Continuing Education Committee
report. Mr. Kerber indicated that the Committee met
five times instead of three and that it was a typographical error. Mr. Munski asked for any other questions regarding the four
annual reports. Mr. Perry asked about the Faculty Instructional Development
Committee report regarding the item noting that the Alumni Foundation is discontinuing
funding for faculty programs. He expressed a need for an explanation regarding
this. Mr. Petros withdrew his original motion and moved
to send the report back to the Committee to address this issue. Discussion
ensued. There was a request that the Committee be urged to clarify the matter.
A Committee member indicated that they were notified that funding was not
available but they did not receive details. Mr. Gallager,
who is on the Foundation board, indicated that funds have been reallocated.
For clarification, Mr.
Hilliard indicated that the purpose of the consent calendar is to just file
reports, but that the Senate can also ask for further information. Mr. Petros withdrew his motion. Mr. Munski
suggested accepting the reports and requesting additional information from the
Faculty Instructional Development Committee. Mr. Petros
moved to accept the consent calendar. Ms. Potvin
seconded and the motion passed with a vote of 43 for and 10 against. Mr. Petros moved that Mr. Munski
request in writing that the Alumni Foundation explain why the funds are not
available. Mr. Jackson seconded and the
motion was approved with a vote of 44 for and 7 against. Mr. Munski suggested that they also be invited to Senate. He
was granted that discretion.
8.
Ms. Jeno moved to accept the Curriculum Committee report. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Petros. A question was
posed by Mr. Poochigian regarding the program change
for the B.S. in Geological Engineering to take either Phil 370 or ChE 340. Mr. Gosnold explained that
an ethics course is required and that Chemical Engineering developed a course
which meets the ethics requirement. The motion was approved with a vote of 46
for, 1 against and 3 abstaining.
9.
Mr. Munski explained that the UND Diversity Advisory Committee has
not yet submitted their revision recommendations on the Institutional Statement
on Diversity and Pluralism; therefore, the item was deferred to the November Senate
meeting.
10.
Mr. Jackson moved to
approve the proposed changes to the repeat policy. Mr. Perry seconded and discussion ensued. A question
was raised regarding removing advisors from the process. It was explained that the
registration system has always permitted registrations and petitions have not
been denied. The motion was approved with a vote of 44 for and 1 against.
11.
Information
regarding the Senate Scholarly Activities Committee funding project was
reviewed. Mr. Alfonso, Vice President
for Research, was not able to attend the meeting but provided a letter to
address the funding issue. The letter indicated that there is a possibility of funding
in the spring. Mr. Milavetz, Associate Vice President
for Research, commented that the Senate Scholarly Activities Committee
addresses funding for small seed grants, travel, and publication. He also
commented that the original budget was smaller due to this lack of funding and,
therefore, the money was reduced for all areas. He reported that, up to this
point, there have been only fall travel awards and that the next meeting will
be on publication funding. Mr. Murphy suggested a philosophic discussion on how
UND spends funds and that some spending may be out of “kilter.” Mr. Watson indicated that he is on the
research council and there are no discretionary funds.
12.
Mr. Poochigian moved to extend the meeting to 5:40 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mr. Jerath and approved with a vote of 41 for, 1 against and 2
abstaining.
13.
Mr. Watson indicated
that lack of funding for the Scholarly Activities Committee is symptomatic of
other situations as well.
Mr. Murphy moved
that the Senate express concern to the President and Executive Officers
regarding the lack of effort to maintain funding for the work of the Senate Scholarly
Activities Committee, as well as the inability to have faculty seed grants. He
further indicated that this is the opposite direction of UND’s
mission for research. Ms. C. Anderson seconded. Mr. Poochigian
made a friendly amendment to request an explanation of why this is happening. Mr.
Jerath stated that seed money is not there due to the
lack of support from the city of Grand Forks. Mr. Poochigian
stated that the Senate discussion continuing to refer to the brand audit
priority raises questions regarding the character of the institution within
light of its research mission. Mr. Milavetz explained
that the lack of seed money is due to the Alumni Foundation and city of Grand
Forks no longer supporting that program. The motion was clarified for the vote.
The clarified wording upon which the Senate voted was: “The University Senate wishes
to express its significant concern regarding the marked reduction in funding
for the Senate Scholarly Activities Committee, and that a request be made for
an explanation from the President. In addition, we request a similar explanation
for the reduction in the faculty seed grant program.” The motion was approved with a vote of 26 for
1 against and 2 abstentions.
14.
The meeting
adjourned at 5:38 p.m.
Suzanne Anderson
Secretary to the
Senate