Minutes of the University Senate
Meeting
November 4, 2004
1.
The
November meeting
of the University Senate was held at 4:05 p.m. on Thursday, November 4,
2004 in
Room 7, Gamble Hall. Sue Jeno
presided.
2.
The
following
members of the Senate were present:
Anderson,
Christopher
Berne,
Jane
Bjerke,
Elizabeth
Blackburn,
Royce
Chen,
Tar-Pin
Dearden,
Bruce
Dever,
Adam
Doze, Van
Drewes,
Mary
Elbert,
Dennis
Elsinga,
Lillian
Erickson,
Daniel
Gallager,
Robert
Goodwin,
Janice
Grant,
Emmanuel
Haskins,
Robert
Heitkamp,
Thomasine
Helgeson,
Diane
Hume,
Wendelin
Jeno, Sue
Jones,
Arthur
Kenville,
Kimberly
Knittel,
David
Krogh,
Nancy
Kupchella,
Charles
LaDuke,
John
Lee,
Randy
Lovelace,
Kent
Melland,
Helen
Miller,
Charles
Mochoruk,
James
Moen,
Janet
Munski,
Doug
Murphy,
Eric
Myrick,
Matt
Nelson,
Susan
Nowacki,
Michael
Nutz,
Amber
Picklo,
Matthew
Pierce,
David
Potvin,
Martha
Rakow,
Lana
Reese, Ty
Remfert,
Matt
Rex,
Janet
Robertson,
Charles
Ross,
Vicki
Schuetzle,
Jordan
Schwartz,
Rhonda
Shaeffer,
James
Skramstad,
Allan
Smart,
Kathy
Smith,
Bruce
Stanlake,
Lowell
Stolt,
Wilbur
Williams,
Jim
Yurkovich,
Eleanor
3.
The
following
members of the Senate were absent:
Alfonso,
Peter
Benoit,
Joseph
Boyd,
Robert
Braden,
Chris
Brown,
Richard
Cooper,
Chris
Crawford,
Richard
DeMers,
Judy
Elbert,
Danielle
El-Dweek,
Daniel
Flower,
Ann
Foltz,
Kenneth
Grijalva,
Jim
Hikins,
James
Kalbfleisch,
Pamela
Lane,
Jason
LaPointe,
Jennifer
LeBel,
Paul
McBride,
Rosanne
Muggli,
Darrin
Neuerburg,
Linda
Nies,
Gerry
Patton,
Greg
Petros,
Tom
Poochigian,
Donald
Rankin,
Libby
Rice,
Daniel
Sambor,
Christina
Thureen,
Faythe
Watson,
John
White,
Daniel
Wilson,
H. David
4.
The
following
announcements were made:
B. Ms.
Jeno reported that Mr. Grijalva has appointed three members from the
Senate
Restructuring and Reallocation Committee to the University Planning and
Budget
Committee when that committee operates in budget mode.
C. Ms.
Jeno reported that she attended the first meeting of the University
Planning
and Budget Committee, which was held on October 28, 2004. The Committee
reviewed the current status of the strategic plan. Due to the request
from the
UND Foundation for University priorities from our strategic plan which
they can
use during their strategic planning sessions in January, each
subcommittee has
been charged to identify priority items from their committees by
December 31.
Faculty and staff development was not specifically identified in the
strategic
plan; so as not to lose this important item, the Dean’s Council will
review
faculty development opportunities–-past, present and future. The
Committee
requests that the Staff Senate, via the Staff Senate representatives on
University Senate, appoint an ad hoc committee to do the same type of
review
for staff development. Once the ad hoc committee is established, the
Committee
requests that the Staff Senate let the University Senate chair know who
is on
that committee. The SEC will keep in contact with the Committee. Both
groups
will report ideas back to the University Senate for discussion and the
information will then be forwarded to the University Planning and
Budget
Committee.
D. Mr.
Robertson announced that he has been appointed as the faculty
representative to
the Executive Steering Committee for ConnectND.
He requested that senators contact him if they hear rumors or
have any
questions regarding ConnectND. His phone number is 777-4061 and his
email
address is: robertso@aero.und.edu.
The Vice
Chair asked
for corrections or additions to the October 7, 2004 minutes. There
being none,
the minutes were approved as distributed.
6.
Ms. Hume
asked President
Kuchella about the ad hoc committee on harassment report and whether
suggestions
contained in the report had been sent forward.
Mr. Kupchella stated that the suggestions, along with a few
revisions,
were forwarded to the general counsel, and he believed to the Office of
Civil
Rights as well. Ms. Hume asked if the committee to monitor the
committee had
been appointed by the Senate Executive Committee. Ms.
Jeno replied that the SEC would consider
this and report at the next meeting.
Mr.
LaDuke asked for
an update on the Provost’s search. Mr.
Smith reported that the search committee had met that day and narrowed
the
search. The Committee will go through the final list, develop phone
questions
and meet again on Monday. The Committee hopes to identify finalists in
November
and to bring candidates to campus in December, although the Committee
will
extend the time line to find the best candidate. He
asked senators to encourage excellent
candidates to apply.
Mr.
Blackburn asked
if anyone knew the progress on adding the writing component back into
the
requirements for the ACT. Mr. Kupchella
announced that the Chancellor’s cabinet considered it yesterday. He reported that a majority of academic vice
presidents recommended it be adopted with a list of exceptions. He
reported
that the cabinet was considering language that would allow each campus
to
design their own policy and allow the campus to opt out.
They discussed using the test as feedback for
high schools on how the students are doing, but not as a placement tool. He said an amended policy would likely go
forward to the State Board of Higher Education.
The
question period
closed at 4:20 p.m.
Mr. Lee
moved that
the annual reports of the Senate Honorary Degrees Committee, Senate
Student
Policy Committee, Senate Honors Committee, and Senate General Education
Requirements Committee be received and filed.
The motion was approved unanimously.
8.
Mr.
Myrick moved to
accept the report from the Senate Curriculum Committee.
The motion was approved unanimously.
9.
The
Senate
considered the agenda item from the Council of College Faculties (CCF)
to
review proposed policy changes being considered by the State Board of
Higher
Education (SBHE) that were distributed at the last meeting. The first policy was 305.1, which had
proposed revisions to part 3.g. The Senate
discussed the draft of the changes for this policy.
Mr. Murphy moved to ask the CCF to inform the
State Board of Higher Education that the Senate was in agreement with
the
proposed language to revise this policy.
The senate discussed the motion. The
motion was approved unanimously.
The
Senate also considered
policy 605.3, which proposed revisions in section 9.
Mr. Murphy moved to recommend to CCF that the
Senate supports the proposed revisions as written.
The motion was approved with a vote of 51 in
favor, 1 against and 1 abstention.
10.
Mr.
Schuetzle stated
that the North Dakota Student Association and the UND Student
Government have
gone on record as opposing the writing requirement in the ACT exam. The Student Government discussed bringing a
motion to the Senate, but decided to defer to the Senate to propose a
motion.
11.
The
meeting was
adjourned at 4:48 p.m.
Nancy
Krogh
Secretary to the Senate